Comments

Simple, not Cheap — 14 Comments

  1. I agree and Nikki my wife definitely agrees. We could have got a near voyager for thousands, instead we got one for 100’s. Machines have Hugh amount of residual value, far more than the actual price we pay. I like things like the iPhone iPad, I just have some patience and wait for newness to die down, the price will be a lot less. We have to fight the urge to have the latest and the greatest which come at a high price. So high people get into debt to have it!

    • Thanks Ev,

      I couldn’t agree more – waiting for the newness to die down if you can manage it is definitely worth it. Technology is so amazing these days and moving so fast that even buying yesterday’s product you still get something amazing for an unbelievable price rather than paying something ridiculous. I just bought my daughter a flipcam for £50 for example and it’s awesome – but just because it’s a model that’s now a few years old – still HD, still very easy to use, just not the latest and therefore not at a premium price.

      Thanks for the comment!

      a bientôt,
      Alan

  2. I never knew that there is a big difference between the two. Simple is said to be slight and cheap is more. Hey, I love this post as it helps me on their differences.

    • There really is – and it’s a difference in mindset as much as anything,

      feeling ‘cheap’ can really be a problem but it doesn’t have to be that way (and you still get to save money but have really great stuff – just less of it ;-)),

      glad you liked it (this small post is quite fundamentally what my whole site is about really),

      Alan

  3. I think you make a great point about the differences between living cheaply and living simply. While similar in some ways, they do have some big differences. I like this post for pointing out those differences. The examples you gave were especially good illustrations. You can count me as convinced then.

    When it comes to living simply instead of living cheaply, I think I best do that when I’m traveling. I’ve cut out some of the more unnecessary expenses that don’t add much value to my trips in order to make sure I have enough money left over for my next one. For instance, I’ll stay in hostels with little amenities for simpler way of traveling. Saves me money on stuff I really don’t need anyways.

    • You’re absolutely right Steve and I’m glad you liked the article.

      Travel is the perfect example where keeping things simple really pays off.

      Plus not to labor the point, when you do keep things simple and cut out all excess, it means the things you do invest in you can really invest in, both in terms of buying quality if you need to and enjoying, appreciating and taking care of those things.

  4. Thanks! I think at this point in my life I’m still at ‘cheap’. Although I am and have always tried to achieve ‘simple’. There’s a fine line between the two.

    • Hi Sabrina,

      Thanks so much for stopping by & commenting!

      … and you’re right there is sometimes a fine line between the two. For me, simple always feels right – the savings you make by living simply are made by improving your life rather than feeling that you’re missing out on things because you can’t afford them or have to. You’re absolutely right though – sometimes this is a fine line.

      I like to think of it as cutting out waste or excess. Then I feel really really good about it, mentally even more than financially.

      take care & best wishes,
      Alan

  5. Great Article Alan,
    The difference between cheap and simple. Yes yes yes of course i agree.
    You give some good examples of experiencing life at a lower cost. Life is too short to NOT experience things because you want to be cheap..
    It’s one of the things i tell people about moving abroad. We chose Marseille because of the affordable cost of living but still can experience the rest of Europe and live our lives. But…. i think you have to be in the right state of mind to accept this kind of paramount shift in thinking. It’s not for everyone. I know my friends back home would die without their porsches and bmw’s and country club memberships but yet they envy the fact that we are living abroad. You can’t always have it all. I digress.

    • I love it when you comment Annie – it’s like you read my mind!

      I could have given 100 more examples and I thought it might make for an interesting post just having lots and lots and lots and lots of examples… but then they’re all over the site and I just wanted to post the article in the end as I had other things I wanted to write.

      Aaaaaanyways, I have the same questions from old colleagues and friends, they think somehow that I will ‘grow out of it’ – like my new life in the countryside is not something serious. My little car, walks in the countryside etc are all scoffed at occasionally by my some of our old friends in London but then when I mention TOTAL FREEDOM and they have to go to the same old job the next day, they’re envious. You’re right, you can’t have it all but I have to honestly say some of the luxuries (which in a lot of cases I now see as ‘excesses’) I don’t think I’ll ever really miss.

      I choose life … Nature … FREEDOM!!

      😉

  6. I love your posts about money saving and living it cheap. Any extra cash never hurt any body. Yes, I am convinced, we could do with a lot of decluttering. Sometimes we bring in things and we never use them and that is where the problem starts, though we don’t realize it then. I loved the comparison of cheap and simple. Make so much sense.

    • Hmmm – thanks. Though you kind of raised the very thing I’m concerned about and the reason I wrote this post.

      Cheap is OK as long as it’s concerned with getting a better deal.

      Cheap is not OK if you feel cheap, feel you have to be cheap or if it compromises your quality of life.

      Simple is better than cheap (and happens to work out cheaper anyway).

      • There is huge difference between simple and cheap. Simple saves money and helps you grow; but cheap actually makes living difficult. I remember a neighbor was was financially well but still cheap. She was over 50 and had bad knees but insisted on walking long distances to save on my car money. Though small walks was recommended for her; she walked way too much for groceries and all. She actually had a lot of knee trouble later on which restricted her movement highly. That was how cheap lead to difficulty.

        • Sooooooo right Hajra,

          The story about the financially well but still cheap woman makes me laugh – I have a couple of relatives like that.

          At the end of the day, health is most important – unfortunately with this type of people, they start to put up the money they should have been long ago when it’s too late (health-wise).

          Great example Hajra, thanks for the comment & apologies for taking so long to reply…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Content Protected Using Blog Protector By: PcDrome.